Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan PSAK 16 dan PSAK 69 Pada Perusahaan Agrikultur

Main Article Content

I Gusti Ketut Agung Ulupui
Argie Destri Rahmani
Dwi Handarini
Hafifah Nasution

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview of the differences in the accounting treatment of biological assets before and after the implementation of PSAK 69, namely based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69. This study analyzed the implementation of PSAK 69 in agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. The data analysis technique used in this study is an interactive model analysis technique namely to know the difference in accounting treatment for biological assets based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69 in 15 agricultural companies. The are three aspects in compared; first on the recognition aspect, based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies recognize plantation crops as assets and do not recognize agricultural products as biological assets. Meanwhile, PSAK 69 measures the biological assets of agricultural companies using fair value less costs to sell and biological assets are not depreciated. Based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies disclose matters related to depreciation.Meanwhile, based on PSAK 69, agricultural companies disclose descriptions of biological asset groups and the value of gain/ losses arising from the use of fair value. Based on the results of the analysis 3 of 15 agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2018 has implemented PSAK 69 as much as 100%, the rest apply PSAK 69 as much as 50% to 94%.

Article Details

How to Cite
I Gusti Ketut Agung Ulupui, Argie Destri Rahmani, Dwi Handarini, & Hafifah Nasution. (2021). Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan PSAK 16 dan PSAK 69 Pada Perusahaan Agrikultur . Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v4i1.84
Section
Articles

References

Ariyanto, S., Sukendar, H., & Kurniawati, H. (2014). Penerapan PSAK Adopsi IAS 41 Agriculture. Binus Business Review, 5(1), 186–193.
Deloitte. (n.d.). IAS 41 - Agriculture. Iasplus.Com. Retrieved March 24, 2020, from https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias41
Feleaga, L., Feleaga, N., & Raileanu, V. (2012). Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XIX(2), 31–38.
Ghozali, I., & Chairiri, A. (2007). Teori Akuntansi (3rd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gischa, S. (2019, December 12). Indonesia sebagai Negara Agraris, Apa Artinya? Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2019/12/12/172322669/indonesia-sebagai-negara-agraris-apa-artinya?page=all
Hariyanti, A. I., & Wijayanti, N. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan International Accounting Standard 41 dan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 69 pada Perusahaan Perkebunan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Papers ”Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan VIII” 14-15 November 2018 Purwokerto, 41(November), 53–63.
IAI. (2018). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. IAI.
IDX. (2019). Fact Book IDX 2019. IDX. https://www.idx.co.id/data-pasar/laporan-statistik/fact-book/
indonesia.go.id. (2018, November 17). Indonesia, Negara Megabiodiversitas. Indonesia.Go.Id. https://indonesia.go.id/ragam/keanekaragaman-hayati/ekonomi/indonesia-negara-megabiodiversitas
Kodriyah, & Monica, V. (2018). Perbandingan Asset Biologis Berdasarkan IAS 41 Agriculture dan PSAK 16 Aset Tetap. Management & Accounting Expose, 1(1), 63–71.
Saputra, D., & Kurniawan. (n.d.). Implementasi Amandemen IAS 41 di Indonesia, Malaysia dan Thailand. 1–15.
Suhartono, S. (2018). Analisis Komparasi Relevansi Nilai Informasi Akuntansi Sebelum dan Sesudah Adopsi Penuh IFRS di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 11(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v11i1.1084
Syukra, R. (2019). Rakornas Kadin: Investasi Sektor Pertanian Harus Diperkuat. Investor Daily. https://investor.id/business/rakornas-kadin-investasi-sektor-pertanian-harus-diperkuat
Abstract viewed = 391 times
PDF downloaded = 200 times