ASSESSING ESG MATERIALITY THROUGH SUSTAINABILITY REPORT AND STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTIONS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v9i1.907

Authors

  • Dhevita Aufa Athary Vatsala Universitas Indonesia
  • Tubagus Muhamad Yusuf Khudri Universitas Indonesia

Keywords:

Impact materiality, sustainability reporting, stakeholder perception

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate ESG materiality based on sustainability report disclosures and external stakeholder perceptions in a regional development bank. A qualitative case study approach was employed using content analysis and thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. The data were collected from the bank’s sustainability report, interviews, and questionnaires involving external stakeholders. The findings indicated that both the organization and stakeholders placed greater emphasis on social and governance issues than on environmental topics. Most ESG material topics showed relatively consistent priorities between the two perspectives, although differences remained for several topics. Overall, the findings suggest that the bank’s ESG disclosures generally reflect stakeholder priorities, while several areas require further strengthening to improve alignment with stakeholder expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M., & Lee, S. H. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2965–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x

Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910

Baumüller, J., & Sopp, K. (2021). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114

Beske, F., Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. C. (2020). Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343

Bronzini, M., Nicolini, C., Lepri, B., & Passerini, A. (2024). Glitter or gold ? Deriving structured insights from sustainability reports via large language models. EPJ Data Science 13(41), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00481-2

Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100876

Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345(June), 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829

Chiacchio, L. Di, Vivian, B., Cegarra-Navarro, J., & Garcia-Perez, A. (2024). The evolution of non-financial report quality and visual content: Information asymmetry and strategic signalling: a cross-cultural perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability (Issue 0123456789). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04779-z

Cooper, S., & Michelon, G. (2022). Conceptions of materiality in sustainability reporting frameworks: Commonalities, differences and possibilities. In C. A. Adams (Ed.), Handbook of accounting and sustainability (1st ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/conceptions-of-materiality-in-sustainability-reporting-frameworks

Creswell, john w., & Creswell, j. david. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Writing Center Talk over Time. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3

Daromes, F. E., Holly, A., & Loeferdy, M. (2023). Analisis aspek materialitas dalam pelaporan keberlanjutan. WACANA EKONOMI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Akuntansi), 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22225/we.22.1.2023.1-17

Dathe, T., Helmold, M., Dathe, R., & Dathe, I. (2024). ESG Stakeholders. In implementing Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles for sustainable businesses: a practical guide in sustainability management (pp. 113–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52734-0_9

Deepak, D., Reshma, S. P., Vennila, R., & Sudha, B. (2024). A Systematic Review of sustainability assessment instruments: Examining the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ( SASB ) and the Global Reporting Initiative ( GRI ). NIFM Journal of Public Financial Management, February, 33–41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381706607_A_Systematic_Review_of_Sustainability_Assessment_Instruments_Examining_the_Sustainability_Accounting_Standards_Board_SASB_and_the_Global_Reporting_Initiative_GRI

Farooq, M. B., & de Villiers, C. (2019). Understanding how managers institutionalise sustainability reporting: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1240–1269. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2958

Formisano, V., Fedele, M., & Calabrese, M. (2018). The strategic priorities in the materiality matrix of the banking enterprise. The TQM Journal, 30(5), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2017-0134

Garst, J., Maas, K., & Suijs, J. (2022). Materiality assessment is an art, not a science: selecting ESG topics for sustainability reports. California Management Review, 65(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221120692

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2021). GRI 3: Material topics 2021 - universal topics. GRI Standards, January, 1–30.

Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380610703120

He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87(August 2022), 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550

Huq, A. M. (2025). A Review of ex ante and ex post materiality measures, and consequences and determinants of material disclosures in sustainability reporting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-04-2024-0084

IAI. (2025). Ratification of Exposure Draft Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Jørgensen, S., Mjøs, A., & Pedersen, L. J. T. (2022). Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: Tensions and potential resolutions. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009

Kassier, L. (2024). Identifying transitions in corporate sustainability reporting: a content analysis of JSE/FTSE multinational sustainability reports from 2016 to 2021. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00099-7

Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Stakeholders’ perspectives on critical success factors for environmental social and governance (ESG) implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 365(June), 121583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121583

Liu, Y., Osterrieder, J., Hadji Misheva, B., Koenigstein, N., & Baals, L. (2023). Navigating the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) landscape: Constructing a robust and reliable scoring engine - insights into data source selection, indicator determination, weighting and aggregation techniques, and validation processes for comp. Open Research Europe, 3. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16278.1

Luque-Vílchez, M., Cordazzo, M., Rimmel, G., & Tilt, C. A. (2023). Key aspects of sustainability reporting quality and the future of GRI. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0127

Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166(June), 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104

Masemola, M. M., & Herbert, S. (2025). Implications of the distinct or interchangeable use of the terms ‘ESG’ and ‘sustainability’ on reporting by global banks. The Business and Management Review, 15(03). https://doi.org/10.24052/bmr/v15nu03/art-21

Menichini, T., & Salierno, G. (2023). Using materiality analysis to determine actual and potential company impacts on sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n2p90

Menicucci, E. (2025). Double materiality and esg for banks bt - esg integration in the banking sector: navigating regulatory frameworks and strategic challenges for financial institutions (E. Menicucci (ed.); pp. 85–106). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81677-2_5

Mezzanotte, F. E. (2023). Corporate sustainability reporting: Double materiality, impacts, and legal risk. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(2), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2319058

Miqdad, M., Assegaf, T. I., Syaifudin, A., & Ayu, I. K. (2024). Aspek hukum Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) sebagai sarana mewujudkan pengembangan perusahaan yang berkelanjutan di indonesia (perbandingan hukum dengan Malaysia). Dinamika, 10323–10338. https://doi.org/https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/24948

Nishitani, K., Nguyen, T. B. H., Trinh, T. Q., Wu, Q., & Kokubu, K. (2021). Are corporate environmental activities to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs) simply greenwashing? An empirical study of environmental management control systems in Vietnamese companies from the stakeholder management perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 296(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113364

Papoutsi, A., & Sodhi, M. M. S. (2020). Does disclosure in sustainability reports indicate actual sustainability performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121049

Puroila, J., & Mäkelä, H. (2019). Matter of opinion: Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1043–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2016-2788

Putri, A., Meiden, C., Dema, Y., Suhartono, S., & Dasawaty, E. S. (2022). Analysis of materiality assessment in the banking industry. International Journal of Social Science, 1(6), 929–936. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v1i6.1912

Reimsbach, D., Schiemann, F., Hahn, R., & Schmiedchen, E. (2020). In the eyes of the beholder : Experimental evidence on the contested nature of materiality in sustainability reporting. Organization & Environment, 33(4)(2020), 624–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619875436

Safriani, M. N., & Utomo, D. C. (2020). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) disclosure terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 9(3), 1–11. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

Saraswati, E., Rumansyah, M. A., & Dewi, A. A. (2024). Materiality and stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Does it matter? Business: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2024.19023

Scholtens, B., & Klooster, S. van’t. (2019). Sustainability and bank risk. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0315-9

Sengupta, U., Pramanik, H. S., Datta, S., Dutta, S., Dasgupta, S., & Kirtania, M. (2023). Assessing sustainability focus across global banks. Development Engineering, 8(August), 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2023.100114

Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2019). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813

Wang, D., Cooper, S. M., Chapman, C. S., & Calace, D. (2024). Sustainability (ESG) reporting: Field evidence on materiality. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4687038

Xiao, X., & Shailer, G. (2022). Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. The British Accounting Review, 54(1), 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101002

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Athary Vatsala, D. A., & Khudri, T. M. Y. (2026). ASSESSING ESG MATERIALITY THROUGH SUSTAINABILITY REPORT AND STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTIONS . Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v9i1.907

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, June 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dhevita Aufa Athary Vatsala, Tubagus Muhamad Yusuf Khudri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain the copyright of their articles.
  • Authors grant Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan the right of first publication.
  • Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, display, and adapt the articles for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as proper credit is given to the author(s) and the source, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • All published articles are open access and may be used for educational, research, and scientific purposes.