ACCOUNTABILITY OF TAX RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY AT DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v6i2.432

Authors

  • Asqolani Asqolani Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
  • Nina Andriana PKN STAN
  • Miftahul Hadi PKN STAN
  • Nur Fathoni Directorat General of Taxes

Keywords:

Accountability, Tax Receivables, Global Accountability Report, OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Audit Report

Abstract

The audit results of the Audit Board (BPK) on the management of tax receivables by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) found inadequacy in the administration of tax receivables with a value of more than Rp 20 trillion and repeated from previous years. The novelty of this study is the use of the Global Accountability Project (GAP) approach and OECD Principles of Corporate Governance to see the extent of public sector accountability in the management of tax receivables by DGT. This research uses qualitative methods using primary data, interviews with DGT, the Audit Board, and the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Finance (ITJEN), and secondary data related to performance achievements during 2019-2022. The results show that, generally, accountability for tax receivables management by DGT has accountability principles in GAP and OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Still, several things need to be improved, such as improving the administration of overdue receivables, adding bailiffs, regulating tax penalties that have yet to be issued, cooperating with third parties, and increasing tax collection budgets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan validitas data melalui triangulasi pada penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK). (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat tahun 2022.

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2019). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja (LAKIP/LAPKIN). https://www.bpkp.go.id/puslitbangwas/konten/2019/LAKIP (accessed 3 November 2023)

Blagescu, M., de Las Casas, L., & Lloyd, R. (2005). Pathways to accountability (Vol. 19). London: One World Trust.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Carroll, C. E. (2016). The SAGE encyclopedia of corporate reputation. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493.n145

Christy, Y., Setiana, S., & Cintia, P. (2017). Efektivitas penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada pemerintahan daerah Kota Bandung (Studi kasus pada Badan Kepegawaian, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan; Bagian Umum dan Perlengkapan dan Badan Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik). Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v9i2.469

Dartini, G., & Jati, I. K. (2016). Pemahaman akuntansi, transparasi, dan akuntabilitas pada kepatuhan wajib pajak badan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2447–2473.

del Vasto, P. H., Del Campo, C., Urquía-Grande, E., & Jorge, S. (2019). Designing an accountability index: A case study of South America Central Governments. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0009

Du Preez, H. (2018). Constructing the fundamental principles of taxation through triangulation. The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research, 16(2), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-52190

Hammer, M. (2018). Pathways to accountability II, the revised global accountability framework. London: One World Trust.

Imam, G. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(North Holland Publishing Company), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602

Jesover, F., & Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non‐OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 127–136. https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00412.x

Kaur, A., & Lodhia, S. K. (2019). Sustainability accounting, accountability and reporting in the public sector: An overview and suggestions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-510

Kementerian Keuangan. (2023). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat 2022.

Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4

Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K. L., & Mechkova, V. (2020). Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000222

Mallinson, S., & Suter, E. (2017). Governance and accountability. Handbook Integrated Care, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56103-5_10

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2004). The OECD principles of corporate governance. Contaduría y Administración, 216. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2005.562

Office of Assistant to Deputy Cabinet Secretary for State Documents & Translation. (2021). Law on Harmonization of Tax Regulations Used to Address COVID-19 Disruptions, Minister Says. https://setkab.go.id/en/law-on-harmonization-of-tax-regulations-used-to-address-covid-19-disruptions-minister-says/ (accessed 2 November 2023).

Pärl, Ü., Paemurru, E., Paemurru, K., & Kivisoo, H. (2020). Dialogical turn of accounting and accountability integrated reporting in non-profit and public-sector organisations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0178

Puspasari, E. (2016). Efektivitas Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabbupaten Purworejo. Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 1(3), 501–513.

Putri, N. P., Tanno, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2019). Pengaruh sistem administrasi perpajakan modern, akuntabilitas dan sanksi perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Jurnal Benefita, 4(2), 386–398.

Rosliyati, A. (2018). Pengaruh implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) terhadap penerapan good governance. Jurnal Wawasan Dan Riset Akuntansi, 1(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.25157/jwr.v1i2.1257

Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif (Qualitative research approach). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Safitri, D. (2016). Pengaruh pelatihan teknis perpajakan, profesionalisme, akuntabilitas, perencanaan pemeriksaan pajak, batasan waktu dan konflik peran terhadap kinerja pemeriksa pajak (Studi empiris pada pemeriksa pajak yang terdaftar di KPP se-Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Akuntansi (Media Riset Akuntansi & Keuangan), 5(1), 83–98.

Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493.n145

Scott, W. R. (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. Fouth Edition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.02.007

Sinaepon, D., Sabijono, H., & Kalalo, M. Y. B. (2022). Evaluasi penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah berdasarkan PP RI Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 pada Pengadilan Militer III-17 Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(4), 50–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v10i4.43655

Subagyo, A. (2020). Aplikasi Metode Riset: Praktik Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mix Methods. Malang: Inteligensia Media.

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2009). What is Good Governance? https://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance (accessed 3 November 2023).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Asqolani, A., Andriana, N. ., Hadi, M., & Fathoni, N. (2023). ACCOUNTABILITY OF TAX RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY AT DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXES. Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(2), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v6i2.432

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, December 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asqolani Asqolani, Nina Andriana, Miftahul Hadi, Nur Fathoni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain the copyright of their articles.
  • Authors grant Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan the right of first publication.
  • Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, display, and adapt the articles for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as proper credit is given to the author(s) and the source, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • All published articles are open access and may be used for educational, research, and scientific purposes.