ACCOUNTABILITY OF TAX RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY AT DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXES

Main Article Content

Asqolani Asqolani
Nina Andriana
Miftahul Hadi
Nur Fathoni

Abstract

Tax receivables managed by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) have enormous potential in state revenues but can also potentially lose the state if not appropriately handled. This can be seen from the audit results of the Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia (BPK), which found inadequate administration of tax receivables with a value of more than Rp 20 trillion and repeated from previous years. This study's novelty is using the Global Accountability Project (GAP) approach and the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance to see the extent of accountability in tax receivables management with DGT as the research object. This study uses a qualitative method using primary data, interviews with DGT, BPK, and the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Finance (ITJEN), and secondary data related to achievements performance during 2019-2022. The research results show that, in general, the accountability of tax receivables management by the DGT is good. Still, several things need improvement, such as improving the administration and supervision of overdue receivables by adding an early warning system, a capable bailiff, regulation of unpublished tax penalties, increasing cooperation with third parties, and increasing the billing budget.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Asqolani, A., Andriana, N., Hadi, M., & Fathoni, N. (2023). ACCOUNTABILITY OF TAX RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY AT DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXES. Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(2), 415-436. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v6i2.432
Section
Articles

References

Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan validitas data melalui triangulasi pada penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK). (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat tahun 2022.
Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2019). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja (LAKIP/LAPKIN). https://www.bpkp.go.id/puslitbangwas/konten/2019/LAKIP (accessed 3 November 2023)
Blagescu, M., de Las Casas, L., & Lloyd, R. (2005). Pathways to accountability (Vol. 19). London: One World Trust.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Carroll, C. E. (2016). The SAGE encyclopedia of corporate reputation. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493.n145
Christy, Y., Setiana, S., & Cintia, P. (2017). Efektivitas penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada pemerintahan daerah Kota Bandung (Studi kasus pada Badan Kepegawaian, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan; Bagian Umum dan Perlengkapan dan Badan Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik). Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v9i2.469
Dartini, G., & Jati, I. K. (2016). Pemahaman akuntansi, transparasi, dan akuntabilitas pada kepatuhan wajib pajak badan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2447–2473.
del Vasto, P. H., Del Campo, C., Urquía-Grande, E., & Jorge, S. (2019). Designing an accountability index: A case study of South America Central Governments. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0009
Du Preez, H. (2018). Constructing the fundamental principles of taxation through triangulation. The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research, 16(2), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-52190
Hammer, M. (2018). Pathways to accountability II, the revised global accountability framework. London: One World Trust.
Imam, G. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(North Holland Publishing Company), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602
Jesover, F., & Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non‐OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 127–136. https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00412.x
Kaur, A., & Lodhia, S. K. (2019). Sustainability accounting, accountability and reporting in the public sector: An overview and suggestions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-510
Kementerian Keuangan. (2023). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat 2022.
Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K. L., & Mechkova, V. (2020). Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000222
Mallinson, S., & Suter, E. (2017). Governance and accountability. Handbook Integrated Care, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56103-5_10
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
OECD. (2004). The OECD principles of corporate governance. Contaduría y Administración, 216. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2005.562
Office of Assistant to Deputy Cabinet Secretary for State Documents & Translation. (2021). Law on Harmonization of Tax Regulations Used to Address COVID-19 Disruptions, Minister Says. https://setkab.go.id/en/law-on-harmonization-of-tax-regulations-used-to-address-covid-19-disruptions-minister-says/ (accessed 2 November 2023).
Pärl, Ü., Paemurru, E., Paemurru, K., & Kivisoo, H. (2020). Dialogical turn of accounting and accountability integrated reporting in non-profit and public-sector organisations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0178
Puspasari, E. (2016). Efektivitas Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabbupaten Purworejo. Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 1(3), 501–513.
Putri, N. P., Tanno, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2019). Pengaruh sistem administrasi perpajakan modern, akuntabilitas dan sanksi perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Jurnal Benefita, 4(2), 386–398.
Rosliyati, A. (2018). Pengaruh implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) terhadap penerapan good governance. Jurnal Wawasan Dan Riset Akuntansi, 1(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.25157/jwr.v1i2.1257
Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif (Qualitative research approach). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Safitri, D. (2016). Pengaruh pelatihan teknis perpajakan, profesionalisme, akuntabilitas, perencanaan pemeriksaan pajak, batasan waktu dan konflik peran terhadap kinerja pemeriksa pajak (Studi empiris pada pemeriksa pajak yang terdaftar di KPP se-Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Akuntansi (Media Riset Akuntansi & Keuangan), 5(1), 83–98.
Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493.n145
Scott, W. R. (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. Fouth Edition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.02.007
Sinaepon, D., Sabijono, H., & Kalalo, M. Y. B. (2022). Evaluasi penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah berdasarkan PP RI Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 pada Pengadilan Militer III-17 Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(4), 50–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v10i4.43655
Subagyo, A. (2020). Aplikasi Metode Riset: Praktik Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mix Methods. Malang: Inteligensia Media.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2009). What is Good Governance? https://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance (accessed 3 November 2023).
Abstract viewed = 71 times
PDF downloaded = 21 times