THE MODERATING ROLE OF CEO OVERCONFIDENCE IN THE EFFECT OF GREEN INNOVATION ON FIRM VALUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v9i1.858Keywords:
CEO overconfidence, green innovation, firm value, upper echelon theoryAbstract
This study examines the effect of green innovation on firm value and investigates whether CEO overconfidence moderates this relationship. The sample consists of 346 non-financial firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange covering the period 2019–2023, yielding 1,730 firm-year observations selected through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using generalized least squares (GLS) to address potential heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in the panel data. The findings reveal that green innovation has a positive and significant impact on firm value. However, CEO overconfidence does not moderate the relationship between them. The results suggest that the value-enhancing effect of green innovation is primarily driven by firm-level strategic initiatives rather than the psychological traits of top executives. The study contributes to the literature on sustainable innovation and behavioral corporate governance by providing evidence from an emerging market context.
Downloads
References
Agustia, D., Sawarjuwono, T., & Dianawati, W. (2019). The mediating effect of environmental management accounting on green innovation - Firm value relationship. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7438
Asni, N., & Agustia, D. (2022). The mediating role of financial performance in the relationship between green innovation and firm value: evidence from ASEAN countries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 1328–1347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2020-0459
Astuti, T., & Ahmar, N. (2025). Effects of green intellectual capital, green accounting, and green innovation on firm value: The moderating role of return on assets. Environmental Economics, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(1).2025.01
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
Cho, K., Kim, H. J., Mun, S., & Han, S. H. (2021). Do confident CEOs increase firm value under competitive pressure? Applied Economics Letters, 28(17), 1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1827133
Dai, D., & Xue, Y. (2022). The impact of green innovation on a firm’s value from the perspective of enterprise life cycles. Sustainability, 14(1226), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031226
Fionita, I., Kufepaksi, M., & Hasnawati, S. (2022). CEO overconfidence, investment decisions and firm value in Indonesia. Economic Annals-XXI, 194(11–12), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V194-06
Gao, Y., & Han, K. (2020). Managerial overconfidence, CSR and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(6), 1600–1618.https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1830558
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Hidayat, I., Hamdani, Abbas, D. S., Lam, N. T., & Sari, P. A. (2024). The role of environmental management accounting in mediating green innovation to firm value: Moderated by quality management. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15869
Husnaini, W., & Tjahjadi, B. (2021). Quality management, green innovation and firm value: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10282
Kraft, P. S., Dickler, T. A., & Withers, M. C. (2025). When do firms benefit from overconfident CEOs? The role of board expertise and power for technological breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 46(2), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3657
Lee, J. (2021). CEO overconfidence and voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: With a focus on the role of corporate governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116054
Lestari, K. C., & Soewarno, N. (2024). Do female directors influence firm value? The mediating role of green innovation. Gender in Management, 39(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-08-2022-0281
Listiani, N., Nugrahanti, Y. W., Damayanti, T. W., & Supramono, S. (2024). Managerial overconfidence, cash flow, tax aggressiveness and firm value. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-1.5
Liu, L. (2024). Green innovation, firm performance, and risk mitigation: evidence from the USA. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(9), 24009–24030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03632-z
Mahmood, A., Mehmood, A., Terzani, S., De Luca, F., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2025). The effect of ESG disclosure on firm value in the European context. Management Decision, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2024-2480
McCarthy, S., Oliver, B., & Song, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.024
Mundi, H. S., & Kaur, P. (2019). Impact of CEO overconfidence on firm performance: An evidence from S&P BSE 200. Vision, 23(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919850935
Park, K. H., Byun, J., & Choi, P. M. S. (2020). Managerial overconfidence, corporate social responsibility activities, and financial constraints. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010061
Rizki, T., & Hartanti, D. (2021). Environmental responsibility, green innovation, firm value: Asean-5. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 4(3), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i3.1349
Samhadi, Roekhudin, & Syaiful Iqbal (2024). The moderating role of good corporate governance in the relationship between green innovation, environmental disclosure and firm value. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 14(3), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v14i3.33925
Shah, S. S. H., Xinping, X., Khan, M. A., & Harjan, S. A. (2018). Investor and manager overconfidence bias and firm value: Micro-level evidence from the Pakistan Equity Market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 190–199. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/7028/pdf
Shao, Y., Zheng, M., Xu, X., & Ji, X. (2025). Does ESG performance have an impact on firm value? Evidence from the Chinese textile and garment industry. Industria Textila, 76(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.076.02.2023126
Shen, Y. (2021). CEO characteristics: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12571
Sutrisno, P., & Karmudiandri, A. (2020). CEO Overconfidence, founder & restatement of financial reporting. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 23(1), 192–198. https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJBEL23-249.pdf
Sutrisno, P., Utama, S., Anitawati Hermawan, A., & Fatima, E. (2022). Founder and descendant vs. professional CEO: Does CEO overconfidence affect tax avoidance in the Indonesia case? Economies, 10(12), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120327
Sutrisno, P., Utama, S., Hermawan, A. A., & Fatima, E. (2023). Do founder CEOs and overconfidence affect firm risk? Accounting Research Journal, 36(4–5), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2022-0234
Tang, C.-H., Lee, Y.-H., Lee, M.-C., & Huang, Y.-L. (2020). CEO characteristics enhancing the impact of CEO overconfidence on firm value after mergers and acquisitions - A case study in China. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091520500034
Ting, I. W. K., Azizan, N. A. B., & Kweh, Q. L. (2015). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between CEO personal characteristics and financial leverage decision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.276
Wang, Y., Han, Y., Du, Q., & Hou, D. (2023). Executive overconfidence and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115570
Xie, Z., Wang, J., & Zhao, G. (2022). Impact of green innovation on firm value: Evidence from listed companies in China’s heavy pollution industries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9(January), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.806926
Yao, Q., Liu, J., Sheng, S., & Fang, H. (2019). Does eco-innovation lift firm value? The contingent role of institutions in emerging markets. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(8), 1763–1778. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2018-0201
Yuniarti, R., Soewarno, N., & Isnalita. (2022). Green innovation on firm value with financial performance as mediating variable: Evidence of the mining industry. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2022.27.2.3
Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability, 12(5), 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Paulina Sutrisno, Elphan Agustinus Na Goppies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright of their articles.
- Authors grant Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan the right of first publication.
- Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, display, and adapt the articles for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as proper credit is given to the author(s) and the source, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
- All published articles are open access and may be used for educational, research, and scientific purposes.




